either my employer or myself owns the copyright to these images, and they will destroy you if you reproduce them inappropriately...DESTROY YOU!
Tuesday, February 26, 2008
editors and rollergirls...
shot a bunch of stuff at a rollergirls practice last week, but due to an editorial "issue," none of it will ever see the light of day...'cept this one right here!
What issue? It is coverage of a sport at best, at the very worst sports entertainment. It seems like there should be a place for Roller Derby in the "state" paper. Please explain?
i seem to recall a photo story on roller derby in the Dem-Gaz about a week or so ago. was shot by one of the LR photogs. hmmmmm. maybe Dan's photos were too good?
just to clarify, this was not a decision about the content of the photos. we were going to sub out the little rock rollergirl page with a northwest rollergirl page wusing my photos, but apparently the story was too "little rock" centered to go with the northwest photos...so, long story short, we subbed one photo and rest went on the net or in the trash. didn't mean to lead everybody on, the editor in question was just confused, not judgmental. sorry for the confusion.
9 comments:
me likes.
issue??
exposed ankles — too racy for print.
No children in the park. That breaks policy at the ADG. :)
What issue? It is coverage of a sport at best, at the very worst sports entertainment. It seems like there should be a place for Roller Derby in the "state" paper.
Please explain?
BOO on editorial issues!
i seem to recall a photo story on roller derby in the Dem-Gaz about a week or so ago. was shot by one of the LR photogs. hmmmmm. maybe Dan's photos were too good?
just to clarify, this was not a decision about the content of the photos. we were going to sub out the little rock rollergirl page with a northwest rollergirl page wusing my photos, but apparently the story was too "little rock" centered to go with the northwest photos...so, long story short, we subbed one photo and rest went on the net or in the trash. didn't mean to lead everybody on, the editor in question was just confused, not judgmental. sorry for the confusion.
d
Post a Comment